|   At  a time when the rancid products of our mass media are worse than ever, it seems  like the release of “Jackass 2” would offer an easy occasion for a stern  browbeating about the dumbing-down of American culture. But no; not even close.  There is a point at which moral seriousness congeals into humorlessness. Wilde  said it best when he wrote of Dickens, “One must have a heart of stone to read  the death of Little Nell without laughing”. With exhilarating vulgarity, Johnny  Knoxville and his cast of crazies tests the mineral content of the hearts of  high-minded moviegoers within the first minute of the film. Those who fail the  test will miss what is by far one of the year’s funniest movies. Though not  quite as fresh and original as the first installment, the sequel’s gross-out  gags are almost as side-splitting and inventive as the original. The final  prank, which operates on multiple levels of clever skullduggery, plays off of  the idea of terrorist airplane bombers, and in its twisted way seems like one  of the sanest, healthiest bits of humor to come along in post-9/11 America.The  glowingly infectious humor of the “Jackass” films doesn’t spring from fecal  obsessions or skater stunts or other mindless “I dare you” fandangos, but  instead something purer and more respectable (if not entirely unrelated to  those things): the sheer fun of friends clowning around with each other. What  comes through is the bond the guys share, a bond familiar to anyone who has  been a part of a gang of mischievous boys. The obvious comparison is to  frat-house hazing, but really it’s more of a piece with goofing around on a school  playground or sitting around suffering after-school boredom in some suburban  teenage wasteland. The stunts, amazing as some of them are, are often  unexciting, but the more involved pranks, such as Knoxville’s punching letter  or the electrified stool on which Wee Man is made to sit, are low-fi gags that  rely on careful observations of human behavior to work. The film affirms human  sociability, however filthy it may be. If nothing else, the fun is genuine; “fun”  in movies is usually a market-group driven disaster of corporate calculation. Here  is a film alive and crackling with laughter, pulsing with camaraderie and trust  as much as it stinks of piss and puke. The damning comment on our culture is  not that a film like this exists, but that the sight of a bunch of friends  making each other laugh is so unusual it almost feels revolutionary.  |